332
and claimed a refund from the Consul-General. Since his return to Shanghai he was sentenced on May 30th., 1908, to a fine of $10 or four days hard labour, for assaulting and threatening the woman whose lover he had killed; and on January 30th., 1909, he was sentenced to $5 fine or three days hard labour for being drunk and disorderly. I understood in 1906 that Hyndrian's family were resident in Hongkong and I am told that they are still there. The only other cases of pauper convicts returned at the public cost are those of O. C. Vaughan and A. H. Guttierrez convicted on March 27th., 1907, of arson and sentenced to five years imprisonment in Hongkong with hard labour.
The Judge at the time of sentence asked the Hongkong Government to order their conduct to be reported on with a view to a remission and they were released after two years. The Shanghai Municipal Police have complained that two such criminals should have been returned without notice to them. Guttierrez is a native of Hongkong and his family reside there. Vaughan was born in Shanghai and has a sister living here. In such cases as this, return to Shanghai at the public cost might be proper, provided that notice were first given to the Shanghai Municipal Police.
In returning time-expired convicts to Shanghai the Hongkong Government may have been going on the analogy
332
and claimed a refund from the Consul-General. Since his return
sokrožnai moketof wit to Y raivosa
3,900f Charurat! 3 sebro 67 to 60 Int**
to Shanghai he was sentenced on May 30th., 1908, to a fine of
$10 or four days hard labour, for assaulting and threatening
TUIO" "#fraron s d Model bre
ab. desrnostnet og beom Ima
no2, non at BOROCREM NÅ HYT of tase of meo entre at
BRONARY Rhode Sol Snellequce dibuia.it ec
90700
la hus non (non vit to sutra: I ert win non 00 tec
r! noci~¶ faleles adt
the woman whose lover he had killed; and on January 30th., 1909,
he was sentenced to $5 fine or three days hard labour for being
drunk and disorderly. I understood in 1906 that Hyndrian's
family were resident in Hongkong and I am told that they are
still there. The only other cases of pauper convicts returned
at the public cost are those of 0. C. Vaughan and A. H.
70 #RO.. nais ný bson ven,
RES, NG, WA
SUMERI Drif te
vode by mažu à sa moriwti
vasid amat bewolfot du- detary to efmua mula no
Net Pade vat na slave etro ametrisa to jumpfv. on need fIA GYM!
kal afde du bor ver af di
dro dubog Tou hear
Zord Jana Ad neuron To NeedA ♬ as hlwolla andareg Hang
* 3
Rottothe trust £62*o*kedze me 03
oliv #tefano-llosed to anelani y{farer une gets wenu.docea to
a to ani raud dan
?
ro #
so welenom i
A
ad ev
36. tisamos · noftroît nude ud bacute" TolvROD
Guttierrez convicted on March 27th., 1907, of arson and sentenc-
-ed to five years imprisonment in Hongkong with hard labour.
The Judge at the time of sentence asked the Hongkong Govern-
-ment to order their conduct to be reported on with a view to a
remission and they were released after two years. The Shanghai
Municipal Police have complained that two such criminals should
have been returned without notice to them. Guttierrez is a
native of Hongkong and his family reside there. Vaughan was
born in Shanghai and has a sister living here. In such cases
as this, return to Shanghai at the public cost might be proper,
provided that notice were first given to the Shanghai Municipal
bow Teemafenses to bevelvoo
Term not heroibol new nanhigi
VĚK OF ORI
t
、.safe Medingdec iro benned 040
Police.
J
•prosto?' mi zodat hier dele doonnosliq-
Brenan og sabongy aki vit Oak bieg tror photun quox poli erit
In returning time-expired convicta to
Shanghai the Hongkong Government may have been going on the
analogy
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.